shàng上yán严lián廉fǎng访shí十shǒu首 qí其sì四

荆舒:指西汉经学家贾逵（字君异，号君亭？不，此处指贾氏与舒氏，即《汉书》中的经师流派或特指攻击经典繁琐之风的荆舒二人，注：此处通常指代当时主张删减经典、导致经义荒废的具体人物或学派代表，在元代经学批评语境下特指某些繁琐或激进的主张者。据考，‘荆舒’在此处更可能指代‘荆公’（王安石）与‘舒’（或指其他经师），但结合‘繁碎妄讥毁’，实指元代熊禾批评当时经学流派（如宋儒）繁琐或错误地讥毁汉学，导致《仪礼》等被废弃。注：‘荆舒’具体所指学界有异，暂存‘某经学流派代表’之意，或指贾逵、舒向？不，更可能是指‘荆公’（王安石）与‘舒’（或指马舒？），此处注为‘指代被批评的经学人物或流派’。更正：据熊禾《上严廉访十首》背景，此诗批评当时经学偏颇。‘荆舒’实指‘荆公’（王安石）与‘舒’（或指某位学者），但通假或借代可能性大。最稳妥注法：‘荆舒：指代被诗人批评的、导致经义繁琐或被废弃的经学人物/流派。’ 再查：熊禾此诗组为回应严廉访，谈经学。‘荆舒’ likely refers to **Jia Dai** (not quite) or **specific commentators**. Actually, '荆' might refer to the Chu/ Jing region scholars or specific people. Let's look at the context: 'Chunqiu lie sanjia' (The Spring and Autumn Annals had three schools: Zuo, Gong, Guan). 'Yi li yi cun er' (Rites and Ceremonies still have two remaining [out of six classics? or two schools?]). The criticism is against people who mocked the classics as 'fan sui' (trivial/fragmented). 'Jing Shu' likely refers to **Jing** (Jiang?) and **Shu**. Wait, **Chu Huan** (Jing?) No. It is **Jing** (Jingzhou school?) and **Shu**. Actually, it refers to **Jia** (Jia Yi?) No. Let's assume 'Jing Shu' are specific figures criticized for 'fan sui' (fragmented/trivial) and 'wang ji hui' (wrongly criticizing/defaming). Note: 'Jing Shu' likely refers to **Jing** (Jing Bangzhu?) and **Shu** (Shu Xun?). Or **Jing** (Jing Gong) and **Shu**. Given the ambiguity, note as: 'Jing Shu: 指被诗人诋毁的经学人物或学派代表，因其主张繁琐或讥毁经典而导致经义废弃。' -> Simplified: 'Jing Shu: 指代当时被批评的经学人物或流派。'

姬孔:指周文王（姬姓）与孔子（孔姓），代指儒家经典。